spacer New here? Join the Ripten community.
We are an independant open forum for both hard-core and casual gamers alike. Membership is free and grants access to exclusive contents.

Returning Riptenner: Login Now
spacer
360 PS3 Nintendo Wii Reviews Interviews Previews Trailers Events News PC DS PSP Retro Gadgets Film & TV Comics
Ripten Team
Founder/Editor-in-Chief
Chad Lakkis
Bio | Posts | AIM | Email
Reviews Editor
Dan Landis
Bio | Posts
Host / Editor
Jon Zungre
Bio | Posts
Associate Editor
Dylan Duarte
Bio | Posts
Writer (US)
Demi Adejuyigbe | Posts
Writer (UK)
Sam Naylor | Posts
Our Friends
G4TV The Feed
g4tv.com/thefeed
Meet In The Lobby
meetinthelobby.com
Read Other Recent Posts
Mike Tyson’s Paparazzi Punch-Out!! Video
GameStop Buys Majority Stake in Video Game Digital Distributor Jolt
Miyamoto: 3D Isn’t Everything
Are You A Video Game Junkie With Mad Writing Skills? Write For Ripten
NFL Super Bowl Champion Steelers Connect with Soldiers in Iraq for Guitar Hero Competition
Emergency Alert System Broadcasts Making Their Way To Video Game Consoles?
Ripten Original Programming
Ripten TV
Ripten Radio
Ripten RSS Feed
Ripten Twitter
Ripten MySpace

spacer
greenpeace-ranks-console-manufacturers-nintendo-tanks

Greenpeace Ranks Console Manufacturers – Nintendo Tanks

by Cavin Smith on November 27, 2007 at 2:06 pm

green_peace1.jpg

It’s time again for Greenpeace International’s “Guide to Greener Electronics,” a report they’ve been putting together every three or four months for the past couple years that compares the manufacturing and processing policies of different consumer electronics giants.

Why should any gamer be concerned with more than the amount of juice their consoles suck up on a monthly basis? Well, December’s guide is the first to include both Nintendo and Microsoft on the list at rather surprising positions, flavoring it with the distinctly sour taste of “system wars.” But hey, who are we to begrudge a fanboy his fresh talking points?

Sony, a rapidly improving member from the start, has hopped up to an impressive 7.3 (out of 10), while the company’s mobile phone division, Sony Ericsson, takes the crown with a 7.7 Greenpeace cites electronics mostly free of PVC and other harmful chemicals as part of the success, as well as improved recycling policies.

Microsoft falls far, far below at a dismal 2.7 with shoddy take-back practices and no quick solution to removing toxins from their production lines.

Nintendo, known for its “clean” image (both in terms of game content and aesthetic design), performed even worse – “the first global brand to score zero across all criteria.” Now, before you throw on a tie-dye shirt and organize a sit-in at NoA headquarters, take a closer look at the details. A quick skim through the company’s in-depth report reveals that the score results from a distinct lack of information. According to Greenpeace, either Nintendo needs to cough up the data or they’re guilty as charged.

So there you have it, environmentally-concerned gamers. Keep in mind, though, that both Microsoft and Sony manufacture various electronic devices, while Nintendo only prints money.

Share This:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • N4G
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Related Posts:
Unlimited Game Rentals Delivered - Free Trial spacer

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Comment Now


Note: Commenting on Ripten does not currently require registration, however to be eligible for contests on the site, you must be a registered user.

Commenting Rules: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Ripten reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. Thanks.

Tired of the Goomba? Upload your own custom comment avatar.

spacer Unlimited Game Rentals Delivered - Free Trial