Comments on: Far Cry 2: Consoles Not A Far Cry From PC

By: ALacount

ALacount — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:52:44 +0000

I’v got the 360 version but cant play it yet because my xbox got rrod at a rather inconvenient time) But the 360 and ps3 version are EXACTLY the same. and of course the pc version looks AMAZING however on the console versions at least, where the yexelled in detail, like fire and foliage they really failed in the textures, they are ps2 standard in some places. It’s like halo 3s glass- every were else beautiful, just one problem…

By: Fanboys

Fanboys — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:28:04 +0000

“So the PS3 version is going to be crap.”
Wow great logic fanboy.

By: John Kershaw

John Kershaw — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:20:12 +0000

@Michael, the PS3 version will be the same as the 360 version. I guess the differences will be found by only the hardest of hardcore fanboys.

If they can get this game running in HD, high frame rate and looking that good on any console, it’s going to be hot.

By: Michael

Michael — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:00:58 +0000

Xbox 360 is the best, thats why. Why no talk about the ps3 version…?

By: Richdad

Richdad — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:22:41 +0000

November build looked great but if the 360 one looks better UBisoft is doing incredible job. It could be the shooter of the year in 2008. But lets say they dont limit the PC version for that. It should look better when a 8800 is used along with 3 GB’s or above of RAM. But hose with 7800, 7900 and 8600 series will be near out standards (console standards) and its more likely happening in most of the games.
Also the November build was looking no less stellar than crysis the artstyle was definitely better but the shading done in Cryteks shooter is still a little better, since this game is getting better in visuals then it could be equivalent to crysis on high settings on consoles and PC version would perform better requiring less hardware than crysis.

By: jinsu

jinsu — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 05:54:08 +0000

So the PS3 version is going to be crap.