spacer New here? Join the Ripten community.
We are an independant open forum for both hard-core and casual gamers alike. Membership is free and grants access to exclusive contents.

Returning Riptenner: Login Now
spacer
360 PS3 Nintendo Wii Reviews Interviews Previews Trailers Events News PC DS PSP Retro Gadgets Film & TV Comics
Ripten Team
Founder/Editor-in-Chief
Chad Lakkis
Bio | Posts | AIM | Email
Reviews Editor
Dan Landis
Bio | Posts
Host / Editor
Jon Zungre
Bio | Posts
Associate Editor
Dylan Duarte
Bio | Posts
Writer (US)
Demi Adejuyigbe | Posts
Writer (UK)
Sam Naylor | Posts
Our Friends
G4TV The Feed
g4tv.com/thefeed
Meet In The Lobby
meetinthelobby.com
Read Other Recent Posts
Are You A Video Game Junkie With Mad Writing Skills? Write For Ripten
NFL Super Bowl Champion Steelers Connect with Soldiers in Iraq for Guitar Hero Competition
Emergency Alert System Broadcasts Making Their Way To Video Game Consoles?
Modern Warfare 2 Writer Reveals Alien & Undead Storyline That Never Was
Sonic The Sackboy: LittleBigPlanet Goes Hedgehog with DLC Costume Pack
VGA 09 Set To Reveal Ten Unnannounced Titles, Including A New Shooter From 2K Games
Ripten Original Programming
Ripten TV
Ripten Radio
Ripten RSS Feed
Ripten Twitter
Ripten MySpace

spacer
new-game-law-is-retarded-and-heres-why

New Game Law is Retarded, and Here’s Why

by Dan Landis on July 22, 2008 at 11:45 pm

In the ongoing fight against free speech, New York Governor David Paterson signed a law today on videogame violence. The law makes it a requirement for consoles to have parental controls and for game boxes to carry age restriction labels. Great job, dumbasses — all that stuff is already being done.

The law also suggests the formation of an “advisory council to study the effects of violent games on the children” and requires the aforementioned parental controls and box labels be in effect by 2010. Gee, I hope we have enough time to get that done.

New York Senator Andrew Lanza states that the study is needed because various other studies in the past have shown that violent behavior is learned, and many violent games these days are kinda violent. They might even be so violent that 9- and 10-year-olds shouldn’t play them. In order to study the affects of violent games on children, however, the children are going to have to play the violent games. Maybe it’s just me, but this just seems ever so slightly fucking stupid.

Maybe the biggest problem with this law, however, is the fact that the same law has been ruled unconstitutional in all of the other states in which it was previously passed. A lawsuit will inevitably be made, and the state will more than likely lose. In this case, the state picks up the tab, and 70,000 taxpayer dollars are wasted on pointless legislature.

Richard Taylor of the Entertainment Software Association comments:

“It also unfairly singles out the video game industry over all other forms of media. If New York lawmakers feel it is the role of government to convene a government commission on game content, they could next turn to other content such as books, theater and film.”

Not everyone is a total moron, though. New York Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Donna Lieberman puts it quite nicely by saying:

“New Yorkers do not need the state judging which video games are appropriate and which aren’t. Parents, not government committees, should be responsible for making those judgments.”

Source: SILive.com

Share This:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • N4G
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Related Posts:
Unlimited Game Rentals Delivered - Free Trial spacer

6 Comments »

  1. madpuppy
    on July 23, 2008 1:15 am

    It’s amazing that people in government can even stand with how much they jerk their knees around non-issues.

  2. Global
    on July 23, 2008 2:04 am
  3. Dan Landis
    on July 23, 2008 2:21 am

    Wish I could see what you’re trying to link to, but it only goes to the homepage.

  4. DavidGX
    on July 23, 2008 5:21 am

    I demand a law that requires butter to be spreadable. Only then will my confidence in politics be restored.

  5. Krispy Demon
    on July 23, 2008 7:17 am

    Global gets .05 cents for every hit to that site.

    See, the problem is that politicians can’t actually come out and say anything on real issues because that might divide the voters or, worse yet, upset their big business financial contributors. They can’t speak out against “Big Butter” because too much money and support is in the system from “Big Butter”. I mean, we all know spreadable butter is the way to go and the only way to make the world a safe and stable place to inhabit, but it just won’t happen because of all the money invested in solid, and environmentally unfriendly, butter bricks.

  6. Ben
    on October 25, 2008 8:04 pm

    well said Krispy.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Comment Now


Note: Commenting on Ripten does not currently require registration, however to be eligible for contests on the site, you must be a registered user.

Commenting Rules: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Ripten reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. Thanks.

Tired of the Goomba? Upload your own custom comment avatar.

spacer Unlimited Game Rentals Delivered - Free Trial