Study: Violence doesn’t affect enjoyment of a game
by Sam Naylor on January 18, 2009 at 3:18 pm
Researchers at the University of Rochester have surveyed 2,670 frequent game players, as well and over 300 undergraduates, and found that violent content has no real effect on the appeal of a game. Using Half-Life 2 and a dev kit, the researchers made two scenarios for the participants: a “violent” one where the player had to kill things with a shotgun, and a “non-violent” on where psychic powers were used to do the same thing, although it was “more like a game of tag” than a deathmatch.
Guess what? The groups had no real difference; there’s very little to suggest that increasing violence increases enjoyment. The lead researched adds that this should be noted by game developers: making a game more violent won’t necessarily make it more fun.
Of course, violence is still fun- if, for example, Left 4 Dead’s zombies simply disappeared as opposed to tearing apart in a bloody mess, I’m sure there would be plenty of complaints. Likewise, the VATS messiness in Fallout 3 certainly adds something to the game. Still, the researchers have it on the nose- good game first, violence second.
 |
|
|
- Study: Gamers More Social Than Non-Gamers
- Driving Games Make Us More Angry than FPS Games
- New Game Law is Retarded, and Here’s Why
- Study Suggests Casual Games Are Therapeutic
- Gold Farming Might Be A $500 Million Industry
- The Red Team Are More Likely to Win
- Shocking: Women Make Up 40% of U.S. Gamers
- Kojima: Violence in Games is Important – If Done Right
1 Comment » |
on January 19, 2009 4:10 pm
well for some people its funner to play games with violence as a matter of fact some people only like violent games