VGA 09 Impressions: Trailers, F-Bombs, Amazon Women, & Scrotum References

vga-09-spike-tv

Spike’s 2009 Video Game Awards are over, and instead of scrutinizing the winners and losers, I’m going to talk about the shows presentation.

Highlights included several f-bombs, various half-naked amazon women standing lifelessly on the stage as different awards are being announced and accepted, and multiple references to balls (testicles) — very awkward. If I have to ever hear Jake Gyllenhaal talk about how video games make his balls feel again it will be too soon. As far as the awards go, is it too much to ask for more of the winners to actually be present? At times I felt like the entire thing could have been done remotely by networking everyone over web cams.

I love Jack Black just as much as the next guy but having him smash his recently awarded trophy for best voice in a game right as the show kicks off sort of sets the bar low. Maybe it was just me, but that came across as more of a black eye to the legitimacy of the award itself, than a funny stunt.

I have no problem with Stevie Wonder presenting the award for best music in a game, but his speech about making games more accessible for blind people sort of damped the mood for me early on. I don’t doubt that there are things developers could do to improve their games for blind individuals but I didn’t believe this was the right venue to make that statement.

Overall, I think the lack of a true host for the show hurt the presentation. Random presenters like Snoop Dogg, Olivia Wilde (the girl from House), and Zachary Quinto (Syler from Heroes and Spock in the recent Star Trek Movie), seemed lost and disconnected from the words they were actually saying. Talking enthusiastically about video games may not be for everyone, but is it asking too much to find a few presenters that appear to genuinely care?

Joel McHale (the guy from Talk Soup and Community) presented one award, and in my opinion, he would have been a great choice for overall host if I had a say in things. While he may or may not have known much about games, his vibe and presentation style was something that I believe would have resonated well with the demographic watching the show.

I’m not sure many big names were present, but a few crowd shots of video game “celebrities” would have been nice too. For all I know the theater could have been filled with stuffed animals, narcoleptics, and fifty Dell customer support reps named Johnny.

The digital stage concept was cool but didn’t translate as well as I thought it would/could on television. I firmly believe that a great deal of work went into creating the various game inspired backgrounds but poor camera angles and other physical stage elements interfered with our ability to enjoy them. While we’re on the topic of television — when the hell is Spike TV unleashing their HD broadcast in more areas? I live in Boston Massachusetts, not Wichita Kansas. Watching trailers in non HD doesn’t doing them justice.

The one comment I will make on the selections has more to do with the process than the actual winners. While I was happy to see Uncharted 2 win best game overall, a conversation I had with a friend prior to the show revolved around multiple console games having an unfair advantage over console exclusive. That argument holds true despite Uncharted defying the odds for best game.

When Assassin’s Creed 2 wins best action game over an action game that happens to win best game overall, something is wrong with the process. I understand the appeal of having fans vote, but another means of selection needs to be considered.

A heavy set Mike Tyson stole the show for me. The only thing that would’ve been better would be seeing him deck the half naked dude who tried to show him up by revealing his six pack to the former heavyweight champ. Mike at least seemed sincere when he asked the people he was presenting along side of who the hell they were.

Games are about interaction, and a Video Game Awards show should find ways to play up the interactive element more. Maybe including a live feed of some viewer comments on recently revealed trailer footage, or splice in some commentary along with the game preview.

As it stands now, the show just seems like a bunch of trailers taking up space on TV, attempting to be justified by plastic monkey trophies that I’m pretty sure the winners themselves give two shits about.

What did you think of this years Video Game Awards show? Do you have ideas you think could improve the show? Sound off in the comments section below.

Please Recommend RipTen on Facebook

  • http://www.facebook.com/MisterGrumbles Tony Fehr

    I'm glad that L4D2 didn't win GotY, I'm very, very happy that God of War III got “Most Anticipated” and I'm quite upset with the new Rock Band band. Grr. I'm NOT a fan of Green Day is any way, shape or form. How about Led Zeppelin? Or if they want more modern, how about a metal band with damn near impossible songs like Lamb of God. Other than that, The Force Unleashed 2 looks neat, but I should probably play the first one before I get too excited. That's my overall view of the 2009 VGA's.

  • http://www.facebook.com/nickreaume Nick Reaume

    I thoroughly enjoyed SW: The Force Unleashed, and actually called it to my friends that they were going to announce a second. Although I do agree with God of War III winning Most Anticipated, my most anticipated is still Mass Effect 2. Dragon Age: Origins winning best RPG was a wonderful thing, I agree wholeheartedly as I'm playing it right now. But I do think Borderlands deserved at least some kind of award, it's damn fun to play with friends online. Presentation, as you said, was very lacking, and those are about all of my comments on tonight.

  • http://www.facebook.com/nickreaume Nick Reaume

    Oh, and Jack Black tried too hard.

  • http://www.ripten.com Chad Lakkis

    What did you guys think of the format of the show and the way the games are selected?

  • http://www.facebook.com/MisterGrumbles Tony Fehr

    I know two hours is a while, but I didn't like how they still had to mash like three or four different awards together right after a commercial. For example, “Like one wins this category and this one wins that category”, and no nominations either. The idea of an actual host is a very good idea. I don't mind if it's like when Samuel L. Jackson presented Star Wars: TFU 2. Sure, that's fine. But I found that a host would have linked everything together with a lot more fluidity. As for games selection, I don't know how they got the selections if it was more popular games, which they thought were most popular or whatever, but there could have a been a at least one more game per category to choose from, maybe not necessarily every category, but at least a few. No matter what, the 2009 VGA's are over now and I know that the next one will be better (at least games wise..).

  • http://www.facebook.com/MisterGrumbles Tony Fehr

    I almost forgot. Best Xbox 360 game goes to L4D2?! I was/am angered. Out of those 4 choices (Batman: AA, Halo: ODST, Forza 3 and L4D2), I woulda even hoped for Halo winning over L4D2 (and I'm not a Halo fan either…). I wish Batman had won it. Another thing I noticed was that all the “Best PS3 game” nominees were exclusives where as there was 3 for Xbox 360. That's not a big deal, but it's still something. They should of had another exclusive for 360 and then had a “Best Multiplatform Game” award.